Kansas Case Reveals Assisted Reproduction Risks

Associated Press - Mon 02:44 PM 01/21/2013

William Marotta thought he'd signed away his parental rights, but was deemed financially responsible when the women split and one sought public assistance.

William Marotta thought he'd signed away his parental rights, but was deemed financially responsible when the women split and one sought public assistance.

The case of a Kansas sperm donor being sued by the state for child support underscores the confusing patchwork of laws that govern how assisted reproduction is regulated in the United States.

Many states haven't updated their laws to address the evolution of family structures, such as parenting by same-sex couples. Experts say as case law changes, families put themselves at risk by failing to seek legal advice.

In late 2012, Kansas officials went after a Topeka man who answered a Craigslist ad from a lesbian couple seeking a sperm donor. William Marotta thought he'd signed away his parental rights, but was deemed financially responsible when the women split and one sought public assistance.

The trio didn't go through a doctor — the only way Kansas recognizes men as donors.

Comments must stay on topic and be respectful. Comments that are personal attacks, make unfounded accusations, or are for the purpose of "trolling" or inciting others will be removed. Offending users will have their profile suspended.

Post a comment Log in or Register to comment

Aurora.

Monday 21 January 2013 23:20 Report this comment

Once again Kansas is behind other states.