Kansas House Approves Tax Cuts Despite Misgivings
Associated Press - Wed 08:37 PM 03/14/2012
The Kansas House has approved a sweeping package of tax cuts, sending it to the Senate despite misgivings that it costs too much and favors the wealthy over poor residents.
The Kansas House has approved a sweeping package of tax cuts, sending it to the Senate despite misgivings that it costs too much and favors the wealthy over poor residents.
Supporters say the plan approved Wednesday is a step toward tax relief and job creation. Critics say some provisions favor the wealthy and businesses. Others say Kansas can't afford the plan, estimated to cost between $375 million to $425 million.
It's the second plan approved by the House in two years to cut income taxes. Last year plan's never got a vote in the Senate. And on Wednesday, a Senate committee endorsed a separate income tax plan offered by Republican Gov. Sam Brownback with minor changes.
House Speaker Mike O'Neal says he's confident some form of tax relief will pass.
Comments must stay on topic and be respectful. Comments that are personal attacks, make unfounded accusations, or are for the purpose of "trolling" or inciting others will be removed. Offending users will have their profile suspended.
Post a comment Log in or Register to comment
mfor1
Wednesday 14 March 2012 21:41 Report this comment
Well well, looks like our so called Gov. is taking care of all his wealthy business buddies in Kansas. This is about as close as you can get to a communist (Hitler). Your going to bankrupt Kansas, and give handouts to the wealthy which in turn they doing nothing but line their pockets with it, there is no jobs created by this, this is just a way you can use tax payers money to help the rich, it is nothing more than a handout to the wealthy, and they will go buy a company car, and another vacation home. And these are the same litte cronies that cry foul if Kansas gives to poor people, because they can't feed their families. Impeach this dumb A**. How Corrupt.
RedNeckWatch
Thursday 15 March 2012 00:35 Report this comment
AMEN mfor1. He is a typical right wing nut. Cut taxes to create jobs. WORNG. If money is spent to create jobs then it is already tax deductible -- no additional tax cut necessary. When are the majority of reasonable Republicans going to take the party back from Brownback and the other rich cronies he represents?
HowardBThiname
Thursday 15 March 2012 07:42 Report this comment
Sorry Mfor1 and RedNeck - cutting taxes DOES spur job growth. This bill doesn't appear to help the rich at all. It's simply a measure to make it easier for businesses to hire more workers. More workers equals job growth. Duh.
horsisaz
Thursday 15 March 2012 10:12 Report this comment
@mfor1,redneckwitch,(consumer dependents)One thing about being a libtard in Kansas,your thoughts and votes will never count for nothing.Libtard= a person who will give away everything he doesn't own.
RedNeckWatch
Thursday 15 March 2012 12:44 Report this comment
Sorry HowardBThiname, it just don't work that way. That is the old Ronald Reagan supply side economic model that gave us our first trillion dollar deficit. Cutting taxes leads to deficits and deficits lead to unemployment and a host of other economic problems. Government needs to pay its bills and maintain the large infrastructure that our economic engine depends on for productivity. Cutting taxes has, unfortunelty, become the mantra of the right wing; and the right wing is shrinking and largely comprised of wealthy whites. Those are FACTS not myths or political ideologies.
horsisaz
Thursday 15 March 2012 14:27 Report this comment
Sorry,redneck,but this a state issue.You left out a lot in an typical leftist statement.Reagan rebuilding the military,Carter's 15-18 interest,FIRST to HIT the trillion mark,this has to be compared to GNP numbers for a good reading of U.S. debt. States are competing for jobs.I myself will purchase a building in another state where I'm presently doing work.Why?Because I can.With fuel cost get higher to commute and cheaper property taxes in the other state.Solving the unemployment issue?Less regulations and people like you grow some balls a start a business.I'm up to three now.
Travis2
Thursday 15 March 2012 15:17 Report this comment
mfor1, why shouldn't we cut taxes for the wealthy? They are the only ones who really pay much income tax anyway. The wealthy are the business owners who provide jobs. Has anyone ever been hired by a poor person? The problem with our country is, 51% pay NO income tax.
RedNeckWatch
Thursday 15 March 2012 15:30 Report this comment
Dear horisiaz -- go ahead and compare it to GDP and you will see the Ronald Reagan supply side economics was a total failure and resulted in the start of the slide to where this country is today economically. Even Reagan's budget director, the brain child behind supply side economics, has written a book about how it was in the end a complete failure and bad economic policy. I agree that both parties are at fault, but the spike in the deficit was the result of Ronald Reagan's failed economic policy.
RedNeckWatch
Thursday 15 March 2012 15:33 Report this comment
Travis2 -- you are correct, we need more taxpayers. But we do not need to cut taxes for the rich to get them. The cost of creating jobs is already tax deductible (i.e., payroll, taxes, plant depreciations, etc. . . ), and serious economist agree that the argument about cutting taxes on the wealthy to create jobs is not legitimate. Think about it. If the rich person spend their money hiring someone for a job, then they deduct those expenses already. What gets taxed is the profit, as it should be under the 16th Amendment and KS Constitution.
Travis2
Thursday 15 March 2012 17:06 Report this comment
My girlfriend has 3 kids, gets child support from her ex. Her W2 showed 900 taken out for fed income tax in 2011. Guess what her federal tax refund was, it was 6200! AND THIS IS WHY OUR COUNTRY IS BANKRUPT. So actually it wasn't even a "refund", it was a handout paid for by the workers and producers of this country. Our tax rates could be reduced 75% if this was stopped!
mfor1
Thursday 15 March 2012 18:25 Report this comment
HowardBthiname- Please elaborate on your statement. How can you freely give companies money, with no rules or regulations, and they are free to do with it what they want and they go buy a company car, a vacation home that they claim is for the business, take vacations ( For business)but create no jobs. I know this because 1. I am a business owner (no I do not take free handouts from the Goverment) 2. I have a friend who I think the world of, who does do this, and he thinks it's great and he had no intentions of hiring for the rest of the year. Your statement is just a statement, equals nothing, means nothing. DUHHHHH.
mfor1
Thursday 15 March 2012 18:30 Report this comment
horshitz oh excuse me horsesass, whoops horsisaz- I looked up the work libtard in the dictionary and couldn't find it, but I did see IGNORANT, and the defifintion was a horses ass. Read my comment to HowardBthistupid, oops I mean HowardBthiname. Oh and by the way go get educated you talk as if you only went to elementary school prolly didn't even get past sixth grade.
mfor1
Thursday 15 March 2012 18:37 Report this comment
Horsesass- "Sorry,redneck,but this a state issue.You left out a lot in an typical leftist statement.Reagan rebuilding the military,Carter's 15-18 interest,FIRST to HIT the trillion mark,this has to be compared to GNP numbers for a good reading of U.S. debt. States are competing for jobs.I myself will purchase a building in another state where I'm presently doing work.Why?Because I can.With fuel cost get higher to commute and cheaper property taxes in the other state.Solving the unemployment issue?Less regulations and people like you grow some balls a start a business.I'm up to three now". Just thought I would let you know when Bill Clinton was in office was the first time we were in the black for the deficit, then the clown took office and we immediately went in the trillion mark all REDDDDDD and him and his cronies on wall street just about bankrupt America. But with our current President were are slowly getting out of the REDDDDDD.
mfor1
Thursday 15 March 2012 18:50 Report this comment
Traviss2- "mfor1, why shouldn't we cut taxes for the wealthy? They are the only ones who really pay much income tax anyway. The wealthy are the business owners who provide jobs. Has anyone ever been hired by a poor person? The problem with our country is, 51% pay NO income tax." Travis I am going to commend you for thinking and asking a great question, the wealthy like Bill Gates, Warren Buffett, who's secretary made $45,000.00 salary last year and paid more than him in taxes. The wealthy have loop holes created for them by the people who corrupt this country need I say more.
mfor1
Thursday 15 March 2012 18:53 Report this comment
Redneckwatch- you are correct on all statements. Thank you for comments.
Travis2
Thursday 15 March 2012 19:25 Report this comment
mfor1, Super rich like Warren Buffet initially paid income taxes on "earned income", at the highest rates. Then he invested wisely with fhis after tax $ into stocks/funds. Most of his income is from Dividends & Long term capital gains taxed at 15%. I am never bitter about not being super rich, instead I try to do the same things they did to become richer!
Travis2
Thursday 15 March 2012 19:44 Report this comment
All the talk about loop holes. Gag me. What loop holes? Isn't it enough if I earn 500k /yr, it gets taxed at 35% fed income tax rate, 6.45% kansas tax, 6.2% SSI tax(12.4% if self employed)So half of the 500k is gone before i get my paycheck. Then with what I have left to spend now, I have to add 8.3% sales tax to everything. Plus I have vehicle/home property taxes to cover with my take home pay. What a corrupt govt!
Travis2
Thursday 15 March 2012 19:50 Report this comment
So one of the terrible loop holes is that if I invest some of what little take home pay I have left into stocks or mutual funds, then I only have to pay 15% tax on the capital gains. Heck I have already been raped by 50% tax rate on money I earned, should I really be expected to pay another 50% tax on the interest my money earned? A loophole is when a single parent pays little to no tax all year long, then gets a $7400 Tax "refund" in February.
Travis2
Thursday 15 March 2012 20:19 Report this comment
Redneckwatch, I suggest we lower the overall Kansas state income tax rates for everyone, and then remove loopholes that allow someone to not pay any kansas state taxes.... so this would increase taxes on those not paying, and decrease taxes on those already paying.
mfor1
Thursday 15 March 2012 20:26 Report this comment
Travis2-"mfor1, Super rich like Warren Buffet initially paid income taxes on "earned income", at the highest rates. Then he invested wisely with fhis after tax $ into stocks/funds. Most of his income is from Dividends & Long term capital gains taxed at 15%. I am never bitter about not being super rich, instead I try to do the same things they did to become richer!" Yes, I understand what you are saying about Warren, but you are slightly not getting it.Let me tell you what I mean about loop holes, You can own a billion dollar company, and make a billion dollars in sales for a year, with the loop holes that the rich people fork money over to lawyers, and political parties, who lobby to twist tweak, and create these holes for their own good and to work in their favor, you can take your billion dollars in sales, and poof make it look like you earned nothing, due to these loop holes, and so their for you pay no taxes. You pay the most in taxes when you invest.
Travis2
Thursday 15 March 2012 20:38 Report this comment
mfor1, no those are called tax write offs. Companys try to look for every possible way to reduce their taxible income, by writing off every possible expense they have running a company. Im sure they do get a little over creative in write offs, but who wouldn't with our punishing US tax code. Thats why corporations are moving overseas with less regulations and lower taxes. Maybe I'm wrong, but a lot of what you are expressing sounds like Wealth Envy.
mfor1
Thursday 15 March 2012 20:41 Report this comment
Travis2- "A loophole is when a single parent pays little to no tax all year long, then gets a $7400 Tax "refund" in February." You do not have to be a single parent to earn a $7400.00 refund. Married couples do also, if you are a single parent and you are not a dead beat dad, you can earn a credit for children. Also you have to understand to have a thriving economy, you have to have a "Checks and Balance System" Right now we do not. That is why America is becoming a third world country. Due to the rich are reaping and not giving their fair share by loop holes, and wages are stagnant, you are going to have maybe 10% rich, and the 90% poor, and in this situation, you as a little person have no voice and the rich run the country.
Travis2
Thursday 15 March 2012 20:49 Report this comment
If I was worth a billion dollars and didn't invest any of it, and just kept it in a giant vault in my home, I wouldn't pay any taxes on April 15th, except property and sales tax. So the govt gives an incentive to get people to invest, by setting tax rates at only 15% on dividend income. This is one reason why so many people have been brainwashed by the left into thinking the evil "rich" dont pay their "fair" share.
Travis2
Thursday 15 March 2012 20:53 Report this comment
mfor1, The US has one of the highest corporate tax rates on the planet. This is why corporations spend millions on tax attorneys. If we got rid of all the lifelong welfare receiving trash, section 8 housing vouchers, food stamps, etc etc, this country could lower the tax rates to an acceptable level where they wouldn't have to work so hard to find loopholes and tax write offs to lower their tax bill. Our tax code is the most complicated mess ever created by man.
mfor1
Thursday 15 March 2012 21:01 Report this comment
Travis2 "mfor1, no those are called tax write offs. Companys try to look for every possible way to reduce their taxible income, by writing off every possible expense they have running a company. Im sure they do get a little over creative in write offs, but who wouldn't with our punishing US tax code. Thats why corporations are moving overseas with less regulations and lower taxes. Maybe I'm wrong, but a lot of what you are expressing sounds like Wealth Envy." I can assure I run a company and have plenty, just enough that I give back to my employee's and try to encourage them to become entrepeuners themselves. It's lonely at the top, everyone needs to prosper, and maybe that is what's wrong with this system of America right now we have enacted laws that are stealing from people like you who works hard, so others can get richer. America was founded on freedom and everyone has the right to make as much as they can but they have an obligation to pay their fair share. Continued...
mfor1
Thursday 15 March 2012 21:03 Report this comment
I was taught to work hard, and to give back, and to always pay your fair share. This is when you will always have a checks and blanced system. Company's moving oversees is pure greed I say if you want a Mexico, then let America govern and have rules and regulations like Mexico. Hence then you have your third world country. Is that what you really want? Then can we call America a great place to live?
horsisaz
Thursday 15 March 2012 21:05 Report this comment
Give it up Travis,you can't convince these two libtards,they obviously get income from taxpayers and they are scared of cuts.I'm an conservative,every thing I own is paid for by me.I can survive without liberals like "Redneck and mfor1himself" but they need us to suck on like a tick on a dog.Libtard parisites
mfor1
Thursday 15 March 2012 21:20 Report this comment
Travis2- mfor1, The US has one of the highest corporate tax rates on the planet. This is why corporations spend millions on tax attorneys. If we got rid of all the lifelong welfare receiving trash, section 8 housing vouchers, food stamps, etc etc, this country could lower the tax rates to an acceptable level where they wouldn't have to work so hard to find loopholes and tax write offs to lower their tax bill. Our tax code is the most complicated mess ever created by man. Really? Are you really beleiving that propaganda? So a wealthy company making millions of dollars, may have to go without one more vacation home or a trip to the Swiss Alps because they have to pay a little more in taxes? Really? Well I guess you do want a third world country because if we didn't have section 8, and food stamps we would have dirt roads, with shacks, and shantys lined up with beggers, but then you would have a few palaces, and mansions to look at, you know the kind of stuff you see in third world countrys.
mfor1
Thursday 15 March 2012 21:23 Report this comment
Horsshit and Travis2- You might just watch what you say about people who you think are below you, because one day some lifelong welfare trash might just one day be the kind of trash that saves your life, you know from a burning building your stuck in, or god forbid you have a car accident and they come along and rescue you.
mfor1
Thursday 15 March 2012 21:27 Report this comment
Horseshit- "Give it up Travis,you can't convince these two libtards,they obviously get income from taxpayers and they are scared of cuts.I'm an conservative,every thing I own is paid for by me.I can survive without liberals like "Redneck and mfor1himself" but they need us to suck on like a tick on a dog.Libtard parisites" You my ass*** have nothing. I bet I can guess who you are, and you have nothing you have a tent that is paid for you live and a 1979 truck that needs painted. Hahahha. You really need to go crawl under the rock you came out from under.
RedNeckWatch
Thursday 15 March 2012 21:59 Report this comment
mfor1 -- some of the things you said make sense but the rest is absurd. I EARN enough to be in the top tax bracket and do not get ONE CENT from the government you buffoon. And I am not a liberal -- far from it. I am an educated, hard-working, taxpayer with a great family. I hate government waste and welfare abuse and the like. KMA!
RedNeckWatch
Thursday 15 March 2012 22:02 Report this comment
Travis2 -- if your girlfriend is getting more back than she paid in, then she is committing tax fraud -- pure and simple. If not, then you story is total BS and you don't understand her tax return. That is one of the biggest problems in USA today -- BS prevails over FACTS. Too bad.
Travis2
Thursday 15 March 2012 22:21 Report this comment
Redneck, Seriousy? You dont realize that millions of people get back more than they had taken out of their checks? It is an absolute fact! I have examined manay W2's and documented how much was withheld for the entire year, and when they file head of household, and figure in the standard deduction, personal exemption, child tax credits, all the dependents, education tax credits, bla bla bla, they get back more than what was withheld from their paychecks!
mfor1
Thursday 15 March 2012 22:52 Report this comment
Redneckwatch- mfor1 -- some of the things you said make sense but the rest is absurd. I EARN enough to be in the top tax bracket and do not get ONE CENT from the government you buffoon. And I am not a liberal -- far from it. I am an educated, hard-working, taxpayer with a great family. I hate government waste and welfare abuse and the like. KMA! What type of business do you own? I am also hard working and run a 24 hour business. And I have to tell you to be honest, my accountant has almost made me go over the edge with what I can do to keep from paying taxes to the Goverment. Hence loop holes. No I am not a liberal, was straight Repulican until George Bush came into the pictue, and had to change. I can tell you that a waitress making $2.50 per hour with three kids, and here is the key... it depends on age of the children, can get a $7500.00 tax refund. Continued....
mfor1
Thursday 15 March 2012 22:53 Report this comment
But let me tell you if you was earning this kind of wage per year $7500.00 dollars would not go far. She is making about $11,000 per year at most. So what gives? So in all she is feeding her children and making rent on $18,000.00 per year is that terrible she has to have assistance? You live on that. Is the father working paying taxes, and his fair share to raise these children? Prolly not.
mfor1
Thursday 15 March 2012 23:16 Report this comment
Travis2- "Redneck, Seriousy? You dont realize that millions of people get back more than they had taken out of their checks? It is an absolute fact! I have examined manay W2's and documented how much was withheld for the entire year, and when they file head of household, and figure in the standard deduction, personal exemption, child tax credits, all the dependents, education tax credits, bla bla bla, they get back more than what was withheld from their paychecks!" I don't know what W-2s you have been looking at...but if you have more money taken out of your paycheck for taxes per year for your tax bracket you can get a sizeable refund because Hence you over paid your taxes.
RedNeckWatch
Thursday 15 March 2012 23:22 Report this comment
mfor1 -- prove it. Where is your EVIDENCE rather than your opinion. As a highly regarded, retired tax professional I can tell you that your DO NOT know what you're talking about. You are simply expressing your undedicated opinion. Get your facts straight.
RedNeckWatch
Friday 16 March 2012 00:05 Report this comment
mfor1 -- sorry for the delay responding but I could not stop laughing. Check your math and check the Form 1040. Just because your deductions and exemptions are greater than the amount you paid in for the year DOES NOT mean you get a bigger refund. Unbelievable!!!!!!!!!!!!
Travis2
Friday 16 March 2012 07:11 Report this comment
Redneck i swear to god I am telling the truth. The only way to get more back than your federal tax withholdings, is if you qualify for one or more tax credits. Do I need to explain the difference between tax credits and tax deductions? Also I just used Google and asked the question, and I found tons of information that substantiates my position that yes, many single mothers get back more than was withheld from their checks. Wait...your a tax professional? lol
Travis2
Friday 16 March 2012 07:17 Report this comment
Redneck dont forget the EIC. If you have children you can qualify for the EIC (Earned Income Credit) and could easily get back more than was withheld from your wages.
Travis2
Friday 16 March 2012 08:01 Report this comment
Redneck: Look at #10 at www.irs.gov. Here is the actual link http://www.irs.gov/newsroom/article/0,,id=106182,00.html It says: #10. Additional Child Tax Credit-If the amount of your Child Tax Credit is greater than the amount of income tax you owe, you may be able to claim the Additional Child Tax Credit.
Travis2
Friday 16 March 2012 08:05 Report this comment
YET more proof REDNECK! The earned income credit is a refundable tax credit for lower income working families. The amount of the credit varies depending on your level of income and how many dependents you support. The tax credit can even generate a tax refund larger than the amount of tax paid in through withholding. http://taxes.about.com/od/deductionscredits/qt/earnedincome.htm
Travis2
Friday 16 March 2012 08:20 Report this comment
Redneck,after all the deductions and programs created by the left to help low income people reduce their taxible income to zero, it isn't enough to stop at owing nothing, now add the Earned Income credits, the additional child tax credits, and now you actually are getting a nice big bonus, funded by the high achievers and producers of this country who actually pay taxes and dont get almost everything back when they file.
Taxed
Friday 16 March 2012 09:15 Report this comment
Redneckwatch: "As a highly regarded, retired tax professional" - a tax professional would understand refundable credits. They would also understand how few (49.5% in 2009) pay federal income tax.
Taxed
Friday 16 March 2012 09:22 Report this comment
Clarification: How many pay ZERO federal income tax - which in KS usually means zero state income taxes. In 2009 49.5% paid ZERO income tax, the top 10% paid 70% of the total income taxes but only had 43% of the total income. THAT is the problem with the current tax structures. Using it for income redistribution instead of simple funding of government.
Travis2
Friday 16 March 2012 16:16 Report this comment
Taxed, You are spot on with your comments, Thank you. At least their are a few people who understand what is happening with this corrupt tax system. Most of our taxes are used for income redistribution. Too bad more people dont get this. (We can thank our public "GOVT" schools for this pathetic understanding of our tax system. Even well respected/retired tax professionals dont get it.
RedNeckWatch
Friday 16 March 2012 16:44 Report this comment
Taxed. THe people who qualify for tax credit refund are de minims. Id did not say nobody got more back than they paid in. I disputed that there are millions and millions of them or that a majority of taxpayers qualify for such refunds. No dispute with the percentage of people who pay taxes. Read my prior post.
RedNeckWatch
Friday 16 March 2012 16:47 Report this comment
Taxed - what you are saying is that you do not believe in our Constitution -- state or federal. That is what taxation does and was meant to do. You cannot live in KS or any other state in this country and enjoy all of the benefits the government provides and not pay taxes. Whether you pay more than your FAIR share is a matter of opinion and debate.
Travis2
Friday 16 March 2012 17:05 Report this comment
I belive tax revenue should only be for 3 purposes: 1.Funding of our military to protect our country 2. Police/fire depts to protect us from crime and preserve our property rights 3. Infrastructure such as bridges, highways etc. Should not be any funding of welfare, we have churches for that. A safety net of welfare could be created, but would have to work for it. NO MORE HANDOUTS OUR COUNTRY IS BROKE!
RedNeckWatch
Friday 16 March 2012 23:39 Report this comment
Travis2 -- I take it what you are saying is that you do not support and defend our Constitution or the KS Constitution, is that correct? Life is just not that simple; it never has been and never will be.
Travis2
Saturday 17 March 2012 10:19 Report this comment
Redneck,Nope I dont agree that the govt has a right to seize money from me and give it to others in the form of food, cash assistance, housing. That shold be role of religious and private organizations such as the Red Cross or United way, and we should all be free to donate, and the donations should be tax deductible. Where does the constitution say its acceptable for people to receive welfare for their entire life? Most of the people hit by Katrina in 2005, were 3rd generation welfare recipients. Nice.
RedNeckWatch
Saturday 17 March 2012 12:39 Report this comment
Travis2 -- that is why you could never hold elected office in this country, thankfully. This whole country would descend into anarchy if you were our ruler. And I just cannot let your bigoted Katrina claim slide. The whole damn city of NO was hit by Katrina and surely you are not stupid enough to belive the whole city of NO are 3rd generation welfare recipients are you?
Travis2
Saturday 17 March 2012 13:16 Report this comment
Redneck, it seems you might be a bleeding heart liberal, with a lot of wealth envy. I am not a bigot, only stating truths. I will rephrase it. A large percentage of that population were 2nd and 3rd generation welfare recipients. Make you feel better Redneck? After our tax dollars paid to have them transported to the superdome in Houston Tx, the crime rate increased dramatically in that entire area. Within days the superdome bathrooms were vandalized, and were rapes and untold crimes. This is what we get back from the ungrateful walfare recipients in our country. Yes is a good thing I am not a ruler..lol
RedNeckWatch
Sunday 18 March 2012 08:08 Report this comment
Travis 2 -- just because it is your "belief" does not mean it is not a bigoted belief. In fact, it is your very belif that makes you a bigot. Your claim about 2nd and 3rd generation welfare recipients etc. . . is your "belif" and not FACT. You could not come anywhere close to proving your claim. It is outrageous. And, for the record, I am much more conservative, educated, and wealthier than you. You are not a conservative. A conservative believes in the Constitution and works to enforce its term. You don't meet that definition.
Travis2
Sunday 18 March 2012 08:57 Report this comment
RedNeckWatch, I would conjecture that you are less wealthy than myself, less intelligent, and are likely in Debt. I on the other hand carry no debt, and have an income that allows me to do whatever I want, travel wherever I want, and buy whatever new toy I want. You dont have a clue as to what the constitution represents. I also suspect that you did not retire wealthy as a former tax professional, you already demonstrated you dont understand simple terms such as deductions, dependents, child tax credits, earned income credits. I believe that you are ignorant and have limited education and want to appear intelligent. Maybe you worked in those tax booths in walmart from January to April, entering data from w2 forms and pushing the enter button. Now stop talking, so I can quit wasting my time here.
RedNeckWatch
Sunday 18 March 2012 12:58 Report this comment
Travis2 -- the fact you are familiar with the low income tax matters tells the whole story. You got yours and don't want to contribute to society, not to mention the fact that you are a bigot. Enjoy your retirement. I am enjoying mine. Sitting in the sun this week.
RedNeckWatch
Sunday 18 March 2012 16:13 Report this comment
Oh, and Travis2, CONJECTURE is your middle name I conjecture.