Twinkies Maker Will Close After Strike

ABC Radio News - Fri 07:58 AM 11/16/2012

Hostess said it will seek bankruptcy court permission to close its business and sell its assets, "including its iconic brands and facilities. Bakery operations have been suspended at all plants."

Hostess said it will seek bankruptcy court permission to close its business and sell its assets, "including its iconic brands and facilities. Bakery operations have been suspended at all plants."

Hostess Brands Inc., the maker of the iconic snack Twinkies, announced today that it will liquidate the entire company because not enough striking employees returned to work by a Thursday evening deadline set by the company.

"We deeply regret the necessity of today's decision, but we do not have the financial resources to weather an extended nationwide strike," said Gregory F. Rayburn, chief executive officer. "Hostess Brands will move promptly to lay off most of its 18,500-member workforce and focus on selling its assets to the highest bidders."

Hostess said it will seek bankruptcy court permission to close its business and sell its assets, "including its iconic brands and facilities. Bakery operations have been suspended at all plants."

"The Board of Directors authorized the wind down of Hostess Brands to preserve and maximize the value of the estate after one of the Company's largest unions, the Bakery, Confectionery, Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers International Union (BCTGM), initiated a nationwide strike that crippled the Company's ability to produce and deliver products at multiple facilities," the company said in a statement.

We simply do not have the financial resources to survive an ongoing national strike," Rayburn said in a statement Wednesday. "Therefore, if sufficient employees do not return to work by 5 p.m., EST, on Thursday to restore normal operations, we will be forced to immediately move to liquidate the entire company, which will result in the loss of nearly 18,000 jobs."

A 5 p.m. deadline came and went without workers returning yesterday.

The strikes began on Nov. 9, when the company imposed a contract that would cut workers' wages by 8 percent. The Bakery, Confectionery, Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers International Union (BCTGM) said the contract would also cut benefits by 27 to 32 percent.

Hostess, which is privately owned by two hedge funds, has struggled in recent years with two bankruptcy filings. The company said it "has done everything in its power to pursue a reorganization of its business as a going concern, including spending the better part of 18 months negotiating with its key constituents to obtain a consensual agreement."

"It is now up to Hostess' BCTGM-represented employees and Frank Hurt, their international president, to decide if they want to call off the strike and save this company, or cause massive financial harm to thousands of employees and their families," Rayburn said.

"Hostess Brands is making a mockery of the labor relations system that has been in place for nearly 100 years," union president Hurt said in a statement earlier this week. "Our members are not just striking for themselves, but for all unionized workers across North America who are covered by collective bargaining agreements."

The union, which represents more than 80,000 industry workers, maintains that the company's policies will bring its members back to workplace standards of the 1950s.

The wind down means the closure of 33 bakeries, 565 distribution centers, approximately 5,500 delivery routes and 570 bakery outlet stores throughout the United States, the company said.

Comments must stay on topic and be respectful. Comments that are personal attacks, make unfounded accusations, or are for the purpose of "trolling" or inciting others will be removed. Offending users will have their profile suspended.

Post a comment Log in or Register to comment

kssupermex

Friday 16 November 2012 08:11 Report this comment

It seems to me that it is not a good time to strike, but maybe those workers already knew that the plant was going out of business very soon? Maybe more in this story than we as readers know. Employers also are using the crappy economy as a way to squeeze everything they can out of their current employees to increase production. This way no new hires and using temp employees at many places and laying off regular employees during time. Ive seen it on the local Salina level as well, it does exsits. Still a job is a job and then again the news says it was the bankruptcy court for Hostess that presented their new contract?? I think that should have sent a warning flag up to all at that time.

Iamgonnagetyou

Friday 16 November 2012 08:13 Report this comment

I hope the corrupt unions will buy christmas presents for the workers children and pay theirs mortgages and rents. They already make good money and taking a cut to save your job in todays economy should be a no brainer.

ksfarmdude

Friday 16 November 2012 08:17 Report this comment

I feel sorry for the workers , but good riddence to the products never ate that crap the stuff they made is one reason theres so many Obese fat people out there maybe a new company will start up in their plants and these workers can have jobs again sounds like the company was teetering on the brink of bankrupcy anyway makes me wonder how many high paid executives were stealing their profits while the workers in the plants got squat

FamilyMan08

Friday 16 November 2012 09:23 Report this comment

The kind of high sugar snacks made by Hostess are going by the wayside. It is kind of like the "buggy whip" story. People need to be their own champion in the workplace. Learn a skill and find the best employer for that skill. Pushing a button is not a skill. Unloading flour into a large mixing container is not a skill. Operating a forklift. Maintaining a conveyor line. These are skills that can get you employed.

GetAGrip

Friday 16 November 2012 10:01 Report this comment

Have no fear for the employee's because Obamba is here to help. There will be free handouts for everyone, free cell phones, free this and free that. All taxpayers that work hard at their jobs will help support those 18,000 plus jobs being lost. Makes ya feel so dam good I just want to go take a big sh*)*t!

Aurora

Friday 16 November 2012 16:17 Report this comment

I hope that the unions show that the corporations cannot reduce the workers' standards without consequences. My family relatives who worked in factories in 1950s had higher purchasing power, they were able to buy more things with their wages but now my family relatives struggle to live comfortable, even after cutting their spending. I would rather have the all corporations in America who refuses to return back to 1950s standards shut down and be replaced by local businesses. Local businesses tend to have better standards than the large corporations when they don't have to compete with them.

Aurora

Friday 16 November 2012 16:20 Report this comment

One last thing...at least those Twinkies will not be around to cause more heart attacks and contribute to obesity.

Freewill

Saturday 17 November 2012 08:03 Report this comment

No more deep fried Twinkies. :(

Iamgonnagetyou

Saturday 17 November 2012 09:11 Report this comment

Manybe the lose of all the farm products that goes into the billions of these cakes will affect the farm economy and then affect all of you.

Aurora.

Saturday 17 November 2012 09:16 Report this comment

our family has done just fine. My brother could not get all the high end things he wanted but the family is still doing well. As for Twinkies I would rather eat them and have other people eat them then to use pot or other drugs.

jimdingo

Saturday 17 November 2012 10:19 Report this comment

Pot, legalize it, tax it, sell it. My home state of Colorado did. No you curmudgeons, I'm not moving back. Have a nice Thanksgiving. Remember your fellow man whilst you stuff your gut till it runs out your butt.

DamiStac

Saturday 17 November 2012 19:49 Report this comment

Perhaps those of you who feel like the unions were wrong in this case should look into the CEO of Hostess and see how he got a 300% raise from $750,000 to $2,550,00. The company filed for bankruptcy protection in 2004, and the unions helped them save $110 million by taking "cuts". The company in turn promised to reinvest the money, they did not. In 2011, they approached the unions asking them to take an approximate 30% cut in benefits, at the same time they were giving benefits to CEOs and top executives. The company told the bankruptcy court in 2012, that their "idea" for saving the company was to push more cuts against the union employees. They didn't want to invest more money to streamline production, they didn't want to cut CEO salaries, they wanted to cut money and benefits from the production workers.

ksfarmdude

Saturday 17 November 2012 19:50 Report this comment

jimdingbat I wished you would move back to colorado if you like being a doper so much everything you post makes us all dumber after we read it

jimdingo

Saturday 17 November 2012 19:55 Report this comment

Afraid you were born that way Tonto. Look what's calling the kettle black.

Iamgonnagetyou

Saturday 17 November 2012 22:39 Report this comment

jimdingo your a turkey and ksfarm was right move back to Colorado and smoke your pot. Twinkies at least are legal.

grnthums

Sunday 18 November 2012 02:35 Report this comment

DamiStac has a great point and info. Is Willard a stock holder?